Attributions and perpetrators of incivility in academic surgery

Although incivility has been described in other specialties, little is known about the attributes and perpetrators of it academic surgery. The goal this study was to identify commonly associated experienced by trainees faculty at surgery programs U.S. A web-based survey including Workplace Incivility Scale (WIS) questions regarding attributions sent institutions across In addition descriptive statistics, multivariable regression models were built determine impact perpetrator type number on overall scores. We received 367 2,661 (13.8%) responses. Top three reasons for hierarchy (50.1%), respondent’s gender (33.8%) intergenerational differences (28.1%). Faculty (58.6%), patients (36.8%), nursing staff (31.9%) most reported parties responsible incivility. Female surgeons experiencing more frequently from all top (i.e., faculty, patients, nurses) when compared identities. Additionally, those who (β = 0.61, 95%CI 0.39–0.82) or nurses 0.23, 0.009–0.45) as an increase attributed hierarchy, gender, differences. Surgical that identified uncivil events surgical workforce. Exposure a greater variety increases levels incivility, emphasizing importance eliminating sources.